Traditional security assessments focus on technical vulnerabilities and process compliance. But 95% of security breaches involve human error or insider threats - risks that can't be detected by vulnerability scanners or penetration tests.
Behavioral risk assessment reveals the psychological factors that drive security-compromising behavior: risk-taking tendencies, compliance resistance, susceptibility to social engineering, and stress responses that lead to mistakes.
Assess each team member's behavioral security risk factors
Identify collective behavioral patterns that create security gaps
Data-driven predictions of future security incidents
Breaches involve human behavior
Average cost of insider threat
Undetected behavioral risks
Risk reduction with profiling
A comprehensive, scientific approach to identifying and quantifying behavioral security risks
Participants complete our validated behavioral assessment combining Big 5 personality traits, DISC analysis, and entrepreneurial risk tolerance measures. The 45-minute assessment provides deep insights into psychological patterns that affect security behavior.
Our proprietary AI engine analyzes responses against our database of security incidents and behavioral patterns. Machine learning models identify correlations between personality traits and security-compromising behaviors.
Receive comprehensive reports with specific, actionable recommendations for risk mitigation. Understand not just what the risks are, but how to address them through targeted interventions, training, and organizational changes.
Comprehensive evaluation across critical behavioral risk dimensions
Assessment of individual tolerance for risk and tendency to bypass security protocols for convenience or speed
Evaluation of respect for rules, policy adherence likelihood, and resistance to security requirements
Measurement of susceptibility to manipulation, trust patterns, and likelihood of falling for social engineering attacks
Analysis of how individuals respond to pressure and whether stress leads to security-compromising shortcuts
Assessment of attention to detail and likelihood of making careless errors that create security vulnerabilities
Evaluation of openness to new security procedures and resistance to policy updates